Gay aggressive

Progressively Aggressive “Gay” Movement, The

Former Congressman Bill Dannemeyer will not conquer any popularity contests in San Francisco. His book, Shadow in the Country — Homosexuality in America, has been fiercely attacked by the “Gay” constituency. In this explosive volume, Dannemeyer charges that our nation “is faced with the gravest epidemic in modern times,” namely AIDS, and that the lesbian community (characterized by an extreme degree of promiscuity) is mostly responsible for this plague. The author further suggests that the so-called “gay” movement is probably the most well-organized, well-disciplined pressure group in the nation.

The homosexual lobby is flexing its muscles in virtually every compartment of society — government, domestic, educational, etc. From the founding of the thirteen colonies until 1961, Sodomy was a violation of the law; during the last forty years, however, the moral fabric of the legal system has begun to unravel in a rapid and frightening way.

The congressman addressed this issue from several vantage points.

First, he raises the issue of what “causes” homosexual

Aggressive Males and Repressed Homosexuality

Charger1

I have often heard that extreme aggressiveness in human males is often a sign of repressed homosexuality. One theory is that the frustration of keeping their sexuality a secret has contributed to aggressiveness. Another more reasonable sounding theory is that they are subconsciously trying to show themselves as excessively “macho,” so that no one would dare think they were gay.

I possess noticed that the topic of sex is discussed more frequently by violent men, and they are often the ones who will target homosexuals and either ridicule them, use derogatory language to describe gays, or use “gay” as an insult. I wonder how much of it is testosterone, and how much of it is desperation. Maybe they are trying to convince themselves of something.

Perhaps this would clarify the frequency of abusive husbands, as compared to abusive wives. Violence is considered an utterance of maleness, and it would be easier to be violent towards someone to whom one is not attracted, but is part of the charade.

On the other hand, maybe the doctrine that overly offensive males are repressed homosexuals was concocted as an ela

.

.